Free CME Psychiatry

The Psychiatry & Psychotherapy Podcast offers free CMEs for the episodes below.

These activities have been approved for AMA PRA CATEGORY 1 CREDITS™.

1 / LISTEN TO THE PODCAST EPISODE

2 / TAKE THE SHORT QUIZ (LINKS BELOW)

To Access Quizzes:

  • Click on quiz link

  • Create a UCI account (at no cost)

  • Click “Course Content” and take the Post-Test

  • This UCI account will be used if you decide to sign up for the full membership

Have questions, get stuck? Email admin@emotionconnection.com and a real person will get back to you within a normal business day

  • 194: Dr. Sue Johnson: The Dance of Love

  • 153: Consciousness & Emotion with Mark Solms

  • 144: Psychodynamic Psychotherapy with Jonathan Shedler, Ph.D”

  • 126: Psychotherapy for Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder:

  • 077: Getting Better Results from your Patients as a Psychotherapist:

  • 032: Therapeutic Alliance Part 2: Meaning and Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy:

  • 023: Flight, Fight, or Shut Down. Understanding Polyvagal Theory:

  • 015: Microexpression to Make Microconnections Part 1

3 / PRINT THE EMAIL WITH THE CERTIFICATE

4 / IN THE FUTURE CONSIDER JOINING THE PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOTHERAPY PODCAST CME MEMBERSHIP: HERE!

Purpose

Target Audience

  • This activity was developed for mental health professionals and those who work with patients with mental illness including: MD, NP, PA, OT, RN, PsyD.

  • Objectives

    • Review evidence-based medicine surrounding psychiatry and psychotherapy topics

    • Learn about the mind/body connection

    • Improve interpersonal connectedness or therapeutic alliance with patients

    • Learn practical psychotherapy techniques

    • Reduce stigma both for patients and providers seeking treatment

Accreditation Statement

  • This activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the accreditation requirements and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint providership of the University of California, Irvine School of Medicine and Emotion Connection LLC. The University of California, Irvine School of Medicine is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

Designation Statement

  • The University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, designates this enduring material for a maximum of *1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit™ per hour. Participants should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their engagement in the activity.

California Assembly Bill 1195

  • This activity is in compliance with California Assembly Bill 1195, which requires continuing medical education activities with patient care components to include curriculum in the subjects of cultural and linguistic competency. For specific information regarding Bill 1195 and definitions of cultural and linguistic competency, please visit the CME website at http://www.meded.uci.edu/CME/.

Faculty List

  • Below in the episode selection is a list of presenters.  Click here for a full list of reviewers, content direction team, presenters, and collaborators and their conflicts of interest. 

UCI OCME requires that the content of CME activities and related materials provide balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor. Planning must be free of the influence or control of a commercial entity, and promote improvements or quality in healthcare. It is the policy of the UCI Office of Continuing Medical Education to insure balance, independence, objectivity, and scientific rigor in all its educational activities. All faculty participating in UCI provided CME programs are expected to disclose to the activity participants any real or apparent conflict(s) of interest that may have a direct bearing on the subject matter of the continuing medical education activity. This pertains to relationships with pharmaceutical companies, biomedical device manufacturers, or other corporations whose products or services are related to the activity content. The intent of this policy is identifying potential conflicts of interest so participants can form their own judgments with full disclosure of the facts.  It remains for the participants to determine whether the speaker’s outside interests reflect a possible bias in either the exposition or the conclusions presented.